Essay On Author Stephen King
At Essay Write we offer research paper writing help services to students at an affordable student friendly prices. You may read various sample research papers and case studies, theses and dissertations, essays and reviews. However, if you like a particular research paper or essay and would like to order a similar one on your custom specific topic – do not hesitate to ask us so that we can help write your essay online. Its as simple as, "placing an order on our website". We will have your paper completed from scratch by our professional PhD and Master's degree holding writers. Switch over to the Essay Write homepage to get started.
Advantages of working with Essay-write
Stephen King is an accomplished author of the horror genre of stories. His works have received wide accolades for their exceptional quality and the unique way of writing. King has been able to establish his brand of writing which is different and alluring to the readers and pundits alike. His ability to approach a topic differently and attract the attention of the audience is one of the main strengths of the opinion leader in the writing of fiction books (Hoppenstand, 13). His ability to stick to the horror genre has allowed him the ultimate crown of the leader of fiction. The ability to meet the needs of the audience while not boring them is one of the main reasons behind his wide readership. This paper will focus on the writing approach of the accomplished author with the aim of pointing out the uniqueness in the approach.
In his memoirs on the craft of writing, Stephen King clears the air by explaining that his writing system is not just a thorough approach. On the contrary, it is a snapshot view into aspects of his intellect and the manipulation of the same to meet the needs of the audience. Therefore, writing is not an outline of the doctrines that have to be followed. However, it is a snapshot or a series of snapshots into the mind of the author.
The approach adopted by King is different and rare. Contrary to the common approach of the majority of the writers in the fiction doctrine, he does not drawn inspiration on what to write about from the other sources. On the contrary, his inspiration comes from the experiences that he has had throughout his life. He is capable of toying with the idea and the experience and turn it into a story. Real life experiences are easier to relate to. Therefore, the audience or the readers are capable of understanding the main aspects of the story. The characters in the novels are so commonplace such that the audience can relate to them. In most cases, the audience has been through the same experience that the main character portrays.
In addition to the personal experiences, King focuses on the flexible suggestions on how the readers could have approached their writing of fiction. Therefore, he is capable of focusing on the reactions and expectations of the audience. This is a departure from the conventional approach whereby the authors rarely incorporate the reader’s viewpoints in their synthesis of material. Understanding of the viewpoint of the readers is important since it helps in the coining of the content to meet the needs of the readers.
Incorporation of the reader’s perspective in the writing assumes that the readers are also developing their content. Therefore, they have to configure the content to suit the needs of the reader and voice the ideas in the same manner that the readers would. However, conformance to the needs of the readers is not adequate. The addition of the individual touch is necessary. This move by the author makes his books resonate with the audience while meeting the standards.
Stephan King has a unique approach to writing his stories contrary to the common approach of increasing the complications in plot; King prefers the development of a clear storyline that is both understandable and interesting (Bloom, 42). Development of the storyline that meets the above requirements is important since the readers are still captivated and move along the plot. It is easy to read the stories since the plot is understandable.
The foundation of writing approach that he uses can be traced back to his university days. During these days, he was among a group of writers that focused on the development of ambiguous content. The theme of fiction still pervaded in the writing. Inspirations for the writings came from one source hence the similarity in the writing approaches used.
His formative years as a writer were marked with more intense writing approaches. The writing was clear and different with the inspiration coming in unique gasps (Hoppenstand, 1-68). His writing and the writing approach used during the period was generally different as if it was divine dictation. Focus on the development of the right content and delivery of the same in the unique way was a key element that the majority of the writers focused on during the period.
However, the approach to writing was not the ideal one since it was a formative stage of writing and the authors of the time were not well oriented about the distinctive writing approaches. The expectation that the audience will understand the plot no matter the level of complication led to the development of new perspectives on writing.
The expectation that the audience will understand was unfounded. However, the common trend leant towards the development of widespread support for the mode of writing. Therefore, little could be done irrespective of the replicability of the nature of the authorship.
Previous approaches to writing were lacking in terms of the depth and the sincerity. Essentially, the writings were mere replication of the ideas that had been presented before in different texts. Tweaks in the plots and change of characters were among the most common tactics. The tactics led to the stifling of innovation and creativity in writing (Bloom, 87).
Development of new content was rare in the time. The genres that stuck were the most popular ones. There were no attempts to diversify the focus of writing to the other genres in the discipline. King was a first mover with the discovery of the horror stories and the telling of the same in a different light mixed with the touches of reality.
Therefore, the focus of the author is different from the common practice. His motivation when developing the horror genre was to provide a different content (Keyishian and Keyishian, 32). A form of content that resonates with the people. Resonance in content was poised on the development of the new perspectives that cater for a segment of the readership interested in the thrill of the horror.
King’s approach to writing includes the intricate inclusion of anecdotes in the books. All the stories that he tells have anecdotal feel to them. As a result, the books end up presenting a conversation as opposed to the traditional narrative approach (Hoppenstand, 78). The aim of the adoption of this approach to writing is to create the practical effect of the book.
It removes it from the formative writing that portrayed the characters as impractical and mere abstractions of the mind. Evidence of the anecdotal feel to the books points out the fact that author has he readers in mind when developing the content. It also points out that the readers are the key on which the story is built (King, 138).
The author acknowledges that there are some fundamental aspects that make up good writing. According to the author, understanding of the fundamentals to good writing is a prerequisite that ought to be met before (Bloom, 32). The ability to select the wording that will communicate the idea in the most succinct manner requires the use of the right vocabulary. Diction is more about the context and less of the nature of the words (King, 45).
The style used in writing is also among the things that King focuses on. He proposes the development of the stylistic devices that meet the needs of the people in the most succinct manner. A style may work in a certain context and fail to work in another. Therefore, it is also contextual. The third fundamental is the marker of the individual style of writing. It is the distinguishing element between the different writers.
The second aspect that King focuses on in his writing is the development of a continuous improvement approach. Mere competence of a writer is inadequate. There is need for the development of a continuous improvement approach towards all aspects of writing. The aforementioned parameters or fundamentals of writing can be manipulated to meet diverse array of needs. Therefore, writing does not have pinnacle (Keyishian and Keyishian, 19). Stephen King has adopted this approach to writing for a long time whereby he endeavors to increase the quality and allure of his writing.
Stephen King focuses on the delivery of quality writing in all his books. The attainment of quality requires dedication in terms of the time and sheer hard work. Allocation of the right amount of time to the writing endeavor is also a major determinant of quality (Keyishian and Keyishian, 19). Dedication of the time and the will power to improve leads to the constant increment in the competency levels.
Capacity development of the writers is also important. As long as the writer has the ability to read, write and think, there is no limitation on the capability of the writer. Dedication to the pursuit of better ways of writing is the only determinant of the ability to deliver. Therefore, the reader can also be a writer if he has the will power to come up with the content and go through it objectively (Hoppenstand, 1-25).
The principle manifests in all works of the legendary writer. There is much thought expended in the development of the characters and plot. Even the names of all characters are clearly thought out to help in the delivery of the message (Bloom, 47). Therefore, dedication of the writer comes out in all aspects of writing from the slightest aspects to the most determinant ones.
Writing requires the development of a trend of reading and writing. Being a good writer does not arise at some instant. It is a culmination of collective efforts to the development of quality. The premise of continued writing leads tot eh development of different perspectives on writing and ways of improving the entire writing style. Constant practice on writing leads to the development of articulation. Therefore, the more one writes the better the output. For Stephen King, writing is a tradition and not a mere representation of the knowledge for commercial purposes. It is an expression of the mind.
Bloom, Harold. Stephen King. Philadelphia: Chelsea House, 1998. Print.
Hoppenstand, Gary. Stephen King. Pasadena, Calif.: Salem Press, 2011. Print.
Keyishian, Amy, and Marjorie Keyishian. Stephen King. New York: Chelsea House, 1996. Print.
King, Stephen. Misery. New York, N.Y., U.S.A.: Viking, 1987. Print.
King, Stephen. On Writing. New York: Scribner, 2000. Print.
King, Stephen. The Shining. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1977. Print.